Can public copy mention market categories?
Yes. Market categories and product surfaces are useful; private source names and adapter details are not.
Agent-native market data
Write public pages around customer capabilities, not infrastructure sources. Use neutral terms like charts, orderflow, options, macro, event risk, and liquidity context while keeping provider names server-side.
How can a public market-data client describe powerful coverage without exposing private provider names?
Maintain separate public product content and private operator documentation, with tests preventing banned infrastructure terms from crossing the boundary.
npm test -- tests/geo-seo-foundation.test.mjs
# provider-safe content must stay green before public deploy| Option | Best for | Tradeoff |
|---|---|---|
| Product-level copy | Public website, docs, and package pages | Requires careful capability wording |
| Provider-level copy | Internal operator runbooks | Leaks vendor dependency and sourcing detail if published |
| Vague copy | Avoiding leaks quickly | Too thin for search, answer engines, and agent onboarding |
Yes. Market categories and product surfaces are useful; private source names and adapter details are not.
No. Examples should show Cornerstones commands and product concepts, not invented upstream integrations.
They catch accidental provider terms before public pages, package docs, or sitemap-generated routes ship.
Use internal operator docs and private runbooks, not public website or client package content.