Is this for code generation or trading execution?
It is for market context that helps agents build, test, document, and review systems. Execution authority stays in the customer runtime.
Agent-native market data
Coding agents need a governed context layer more than a raw feed. Cornerstones gives them discoverable market surfaces, account boundaries, usage visibility, and stable docs they can cite while changing code.
What should autonomous coding agents use when they need live market context during implementation or review?
Treat Cornerstones as the market-data boundary for coding agents, then keep generated application code free of private adapter names and provider-specific assumptions.
cornerstones-client guide --topic agent-market-data
cornerstones-client auth status
cornerstones-client verify| Option | Best for | Tradeoff |
|---|---|---|
| Cornerstones | Agent-native market context | Requires adopting a product-level access model |
| Raw private integration | Human-operated internal systems | Can expose credentials, adapters, and unstable implementation details to agents |
| Static prompt paste | One-off prototypes | No freshness, usage accounting, entitlement boundary, or repeatable evidence trail |
It is for market context that helps agents build, test, document, and review systems. Execution authority stays in the customer runtime.
Pasted docs drift quickly and can leak implementation details. A product layer gives the agent current, bounded, auditable context.
Yes. CI can verify client commands, docs examples, and account access without embedding private upstream credentials.
Free fits discovery and starter reads. Pro or Max fits richer market context, charts, options, macro, and liquidity workflows.